Should You Hire a Player Who Shows Fear or Insecurity?

Not every candidate who walks into your hiring tryout arrives with confidence.

Some arrive with talent - and baggage.

Before you make an offer, you need to know the difference between healthy humility and insecurity that will quietly damage your team.

Researchers Jeffrey Yip and Dritjon Gruda put it plainly in an article posted in The Harvard Business Review:  

Insecure leaders "may appear confident and charismatic, but under pressure their unresolved fears of inadequacy and rejection quietly distort decision-making and can undermine collaboration."

They may micromanage.  Emotionally withdraw.  Resist feedback.  Seek excessive praise.

Sound like anyone you've hired before?

TRUTH CHECK

Insecurity in a candidate isn't automatically disqualifying.  But you must identify it clearly before you make an offer - not after.

Yip and Gruda describe two types.

Anxious insecurity.  These candidates light up with praise and spiral when they feel excluded or criticized.  They tend to read professional disagreements as personal rejection.  

In your hiring tryout, they may be warm, eager, and highly likable.  Watch what happens when you push back on one of their answers.  Do they engage - or do they deflate?

Avoidant insecurity.  These candidates appear calm, rational, and in control.  But they are self-reliant to a fault and allergic to vulnerability.  They shun open dialogue, reject criticism, and rarely show uncertainty.

In your hiring tryout, they may present exceptionally well.  Watch what happens when you ask them about a genuine failure.  Do they go deep - or do they stay behind the wall?

Both types can perform well under the right conditions.  Both can quietly wreck a team under the wrong ones.

If you consider hiring a person with fear or insecurity, here are ways to make the best decision.  Do this before offering them a position on your team.

Map the real scenarios they will face in the role.  Not hypotheticals.  Real situations your team has navigated in the last twelve months.

A client who pushes back hard on a recommendation.  A peer who challenges their approach in a team meeting.  A missed target that requires a candid conversation with their manager.  A team member who underperforms and needs direct feedback.

Walk them through each scenario in your hiring tryout.  Ask them specifically how they would handle it.  Then watch the pattern - not the individual answer.

Then scrimmage them with your existing players.

This is non-negotiable.  Put the candidate in a working session with two or three of your current team members.  Give them a real problem to solve together.

You are not just evaluating the candidate.  You are evaluating the effect of the candidate on your team's current balance and cohesion.

The question isn't only "Can this person perform?"

It's "Does this person make the people around them better - or do they quietly drain the room?"

An anxious candidate may seek constant validation from your strongest players, pulling focus away from the work.

An avoidant candidate may shut down collaborative energy and signal to your team that vulnerability isn't safe.

Both outcomes cost you more than the hire was worth.

If you decide to proceed, build your operating plan around Yip and Gruda’s 3R’s.

Regulate - steady the environment so they don’t spiral under pressure.

Relate - connect their work to outcomes they genuinely care about.

Reason - bring them back to logic and evidence when emotion or defensiveness takes over.

Know in advance which R you will need most.  Know which team members can deliver it.  And be honest with yourself about whether you have the capacity to lead this person well - or whether you are simply hoping the problem resolves itself.

It rarely does.

The right hire adds something positive to your team without costing you the cohesion you've already built.

Hold that standard.

QUESTION:  Have you ever hired someone with visible insecurity, and had it work out well?  What made the difference?  Share it in the comments.

If you want a hiring tryout process that reveals these dynamics BEFORE you make an offer, let's talk.

#HiringStrategy #HiringManagers #LeadershipDevelopment #HiringMistakes #GreatLeadersHireGreatPeople

David Russell

David is the Founder and CEO of Manage 2 Win.

https://www.manage2win.com
Previous
Previous

Should You Hire Someone With a Gap in Their Resume?

Next
Next

How to Achieve Rapid Growth